I spend a lot of time
thinking about politics. It’s an
election year, and people are taking sides, dividing the country up into
different little groups they can easily identify. In the next couple of weeks you’ll soon be
identified as a Democrat or Republican, pro-life or choice, everything will be
a decision on who best suits your individual values. What a great system.
I love politics, and I adore
partisanship. It’s completely corny, but
this country is built upon the right to disagree. We each have individual ideas on how to
improve society, whether it’s a need for more funding for the arts, or education,
or even defense. And these ideas need to
be fleshed out, expounded upon, and then they must be debated. We can have real debates from idealists, from
realists and cynics, in the attempt to discover the facts and how our decisions
could impact the future. We can have a
confluence of ideas, simply by being informed, opinioned and vocal about both.
One of the most overlooked
aspects of partisanship, however, is informed.
In the information age, where we could easily get specifics, track plans
and implement ideas through the internet, our candidates refuse to give
accurate and complete information. Campaigns
are being boiled down to “I will create twelve million new jobs in my first
year,” or “My opponent’s plan will actually add trillions to the deficit.” These are mind-boggling statistics, and yet I
have no idea where they come from. If this
candidate is elected, what will he do? He’ll
fix the economy, but how? And is this
the right thing to do? If it turns out to
be a disastrous plan, how will we know? I’m
speaking in generic terms myself because I don’t have any data from these
campaigns, and I want information. I want
to know what programs will be cut to help pay for others.
For a hypothetical
instance, cutting defense funding in deference to education is a difficult pill
to swallow. But not paying for missile
defense programs that are proven to be ineffective and extremely costly could
save millions each year, which could hire new teachers, or put more computers
in public schools, or possibly even fund some national art projects. And maybe my stance of for education is
completely wrong, that this hypothetical missile defense system is just a short
step away from becoming the backbone of a defense program, but I want to know
how I’m wrong and why it is important. Information
breeds opinions based on facts, not mere speculation.
We all have difficult
decisions to make this coming election. My
advice is simple: research. Research the
candidate, what he says his plans are and his track record. Research what these plans could possibly mean
for the country, and whether or not you agree with them. And most importantly, research yourself. What do you believe in? Odds are you won’t be simply defined as
Republican or Democrat. There are dozens
of issues to consider, and only you know what you stand for and how important
this stance is to you.
After that, it’s
simple. Pull the lever, cast your vote,
and enjoy being yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment